OK, first off, there are a LOT of viewpoints about the concepts that existence is a simulation. Trying to explain them all would be futile. Because the theory is basically not testable that means only two options are available — it’s either true, or it isn’t. Neither outcome can be proven.
So, what this post will do is explain my position and belief (the best I can) on this topic. This is not meant to be an overview of the simulation hypothesis or it’s foundational principles, simply my personal viewpoint based on my own research.
My high level overview of my belief is this: Our entire reality, the universe, every single thing is all part of a giant simulation, programmed by unknown being(s) for unknown reason. One thing I need to point out is that this existence is NOT like in the Matrix movies. We are not human bodies grown and laying in a tube of goo somewhere while we pass away our time in virtual reality.
At this point, this is where I have alternating views and am still somewhat undecided.
On one hand we are all programmed based on station: that is a human has a certain level of fundamental code inherent to humans that suit it’s purpose in the simulation. This goes for every single aspect of the simulation. A dog is programmed for its station, a bird, a rock, water, an amoeba, etc. A dog would not function with human programming and vice versa. In essence we exist inside a highly elaborate video, not so much “game” but, autonomous running simulation and every single thing, from the beginning of time to the end of the universe is all code.
On the other hand, we are conscious beings outside of the “physical” of the simulation and belong to the entirety of the simulation. That is, similar to “The Law of One” everything in the simulation is one and our consciousness exists at the top level of the simulation and is able to be “reset” (or in eastern religious views, reincarnated) to live in the simulation all over again in whatever form the “one” conscious chooses. Everything, other than our conscious, is programming.
The things that I believe are signposts that we are in a simulation (and I will discuss each one later) are the speed of light barrier, the Planck scale, the Double Slit Experiment, the Fermi Paradox, and of course, quantum mechanics.
Trying to put this all into words is difficult, which for me is odd because, normally, I do rather well at typing my thoughts. But this is different. This is like a branch that continually has offshoots that have more offshoots. It’s hard to explain one train of thought and not get sidetracked by another.
I have two views and I am still not sure which is the direction I lean towards. They basically are everything, no and’s, if’s or buts, is programming. The second is that everything is programming except our consciousness.
Many things play into this belief.
At it’s basest level, it just makes sense and, in essence, provides more hope for existence after death than any religion can.
So, let’s start by talking about some of the signposts that point to the simulation theory being the logical conclusion.
Quantum Quirks and Observational Influence:
Quantum mechanics, the branch of physics that governs the behavior of particles at the smallest scales, introduces peculiar phenomena that defy classical intuitions. The observer effect, which suggests that the act of observation influences the behavior of quantum particles, has led some to propose that our reality might be contingent upon observation — a hallmark of a simulated construct.
Digital Nature of Reality:
Some theorists argue that our universe exhibits properties akin to a digital simulation. Discrete units of space and time, similar to pixels, have been theorized, raising questions about whether the fabric of our reality is pixelated or quantized — a characteristic reminiscent of computer-generated simulations.
Limitations in Fundamental Constants:
The fundamental constants that define our universe, such as the speed of light and the strength of gravitational forces, exhibit values that allow for the existence of complex structures like galaxies, stars, and life. Some argue that these precisely tuned constants might be the result of intentional programming, designed to create an environment conducive to the emergence of life within a simulated reality.
Unexplained Phenomena and Glitches:
Anomalies and unexplained phenomena in our reality, such as déjà vu experiences, synchronicities, or moments that seem to defy natural laws, have been viewed as potential glitches in the simulated matrix. Instances where the expected rules of reality appear to momentarily break down raise questions about the authenticity of our perceived existence.
Multiverse Theories and Alternate Realities:
The existence of multiple universes, as proposed by multiverse theories, adds another layer to the simulation argument. If our reality is just one iteration within a vast multiverse, each with its own set of rules, it raises the possibility that the overarching structure could be a simulated construct.
While these signs and considerations don’t conclusively prove that we live in a simulated reality, they serve as thought-provoking indicators that prompt us to reconsider the nature of our existence. The exploration of these signs invites us to engage in a philosophical and scientific journey, contemplating the profound mysteries that surround the nature of reality and our place within the potential intricacies of a simulated cosmos.